BE Technology
/
Dashboard
GL Intelligence
GL Intelligence · FASB Trinity disclosure pipeline
Live data
Segment reporting
3
Reportable operating segments
ASU 2023-07 · effective FY2024
Tax reconciliation
…
vs 21% statutory
ASU 2023-09 · effective FY2025
Disaggregated expenses
$0
Loading
ASU 2024-03 · effective FY2027
Composition by caption
ETR Waterfall · statutory → effective
Table A
Loading waterfall…
Tax bridge summary
21% → —
Statutory rate
21.00%
Effective rate
—
Net reconciling items
—
Total tax expense
—
Per ASC 740-10-50 · disclosed reconciling components ≥5% of statutory tax shown as bars.
Module status
Recent activity
Loading recent activity…
Close tracker
Loading…
Tasks
—
| ID | Task | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
Timeline
Loading…
DISE · ASU 2024-03
Loading…
Footnote draft not run
Idle
Click Generate footnote — the agent will run the full pipeline: classify → materiality threshold → narrative drafting per material caption → publishable Note.
COGS
…
Variance $0 ✓
SG&A
…
Variance $0 ✓
R&D
…
Variance $0 ✓
Variance
$0
All captions ✓
Composition by caption
$0 variance
Disaggregated income statement expenses
Click row to drill down
| Expense caption | DISE total | IS amount | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
Tax reconciliation · ASU 2023-09
Loading…
Table A — ETR reconciliation
Waterfall
Table C — pretax income
Qualitative narratives
Effective tax rate reconciliation
Footed ✓| Line item | Amount ($) | Rate (%) | Material |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
Loading…
ETR waterfall · how statutory becomes effective
—
Each bar shows how a single ETR component adds to or reduces the rate. Click a bar to see the underlying line items and IRC citations.
Income before taxes — domestic vs foreign
Footed ✓| Component | Amount ($) |
|---|---|
| Loading… | |
Loading…
Domestic / Foreign split
Foreign Tax Rate Differential
The Company's foreign operations are subject to tax rates that differ from the US federal statutory rate. The unfavorable differential primarily reflects Subpart F inclusions under IRC Section 951 on passive income from foreign subsidiaries and withholding taxes on intercompany distributions, which more than offset the benefit of lower statutory rates in Ireland and Singapore where the Company maintains manufacturing operations and intellectual property holding structures.
State and Local Income Taxes
The effective tax rate reflects state and local income tax obligations across multiple jurisdictions where the Company maintains significant business operations. The Company files combined unitary returns in California and New York, which impose corporate income tax rates of 8.84% and 7.25%, respectively. State tax liabilities are apportioned using a three-factor formula weighted toward sales.
Nontaxable Income and Nondeductible Expenses
The Company recognized net nondeductible expenses that increased the effective tax rate primarily due to stock-based compensation for which the deduction under IRC Section 83 has not yet been realized, meals and entertainment expenses subject to the 50% limitation under IRC Section 274, and executive compensation exceeding the $1 million deductibility cap under IRC Section 162(m).
Cross-Border Tax Laws (GILTI)
The Company recognized current tax expense under the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income provisions of IRC Section 951A. The inclusion represents excess net tested income from controlled foreign corporations over the ten percent return on qualified business asset investment threshold.
Controller sign-off · T005
ASU 2023-09 tax disclosure review · Loading…
Prerequisites T001–T004 all complete · 4 narratives drafted at 95% confidence · audit trail in BigQuery
Table A
Table C
Audit trail
Table A · ETR reconciliation
Footed ✓| Line item | Amount | Rate % | Material |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
Table C · Domestic vs foreign
Footed ✓| Component | Amount |
|---|---|
| Loading… | |
Audit trail
ImmutableSource tablediplomatic75.dise_reporting.tax_disclosure_output
Run ID2022-012-001
Narrative run IDnarrative-2022-002
Source dataCORTEX_SAP_CDC.BSEG · diplomatic75
Data sourceLoading…
Controller checklist
Table A foots correctly — loading…
Table C cross-checks — loading…
Material items (>5%) have qualitative narrative — foreign rate differential confirmed
IRC citations verified — §951 Subpart F, §951A GILTI, §83, §274, §162(m) referenced correctly
Agrees to trial balance — total tax expense agrees to GL account balances
Audit trail complete — source data, run IDs, model version, and timestamps logged
CFO approval · T006
Final sign-off before 10-K filing · ASU 2023-09 · Loading…
T001–T005 all complete · Controller sign-off recorded · 4 narratives at 95% confidence
Total tax expense
…
Loading
Effective tax rate
…
vs statutory
Foreign pretax income
…
Foreign exposure
Close tasks
—
T006 pending
Executive summary · income tax position
ASU 2023-09Total tax expense
…
Loading…
Effective tax rate
…
Loading…
Largest ETR driver
—
Subpart F + withholding taxes exceed Ireland/Singapore benefit
Domestic vs foreign
—
Loading…
GILTI position
IRC §951A included
IRC §250 deduction not claimed — pending analysis
Data source
Loading…
No spreadsheets · full audit trail in BigQuery
Key risk items for CFO awareness
IRC §250 GILTI deduction not yet claimed — ETR would decrease if claimed. Disclose as uncertain position if material.
MonitorETR significantly above statutory — expect analyst and auditor questions on foreign differential.
Disclosure riskAll GL accounts mapped · $0 DISE variance · Controller sign-off complete · audit trail immutable.
ResolvedCFO confirmation items
I have reviewed total income tax expense and confirm it is consistent with my understanding of the Company's tax position
I have reviewed the ETR and the foreign rate differential disclosure and confirm the narrative accurately explains the drivers
I am aware the IRC §250 GILTI deduction has not been claimed and confirm this is an acceptable disclosure position
I confirm the ASU 2023-09 disclosure is complete, accurate, and ready for inclusion in the 10-K filing
EDGAR Intelligence
Comment-letter exchange + peer XBRL — sourced from SEC EDGAR (sec_comment_corpus · sec_xbrl_facts · sec_company_master)
Live · 156 letters indexed YTD
Comment letters · 5yr
4
Cisco vs peer median 3.5 · 1 currently open
Open commitments
1
CODM definition · SEC still watching 19 days
2025 sector surge
156
SIC 3576 letters · +50% vs 2024
XBRL facts indexed
2.08M
4,677 filers · CY2023–CY2025 · refreshed Sun 06:00
Panel 1 · Your Peer-Relative Risk
SIC 3576 — Computer Communications Equipment
Trailing four quarters · GAAP basis · ETR is effective rate from rate reconciliation
| Company | Revenue ($B) | Gross Margin % | SGA % | R&D % | ETR % |
|---|
SEC Enforcement Posture vs Peers Trailing 5 years · sourced from EDGAR UPLOAD/CORRESP linkage
| Company | Comment Letters | Avg Rounds to Close | Currently Open |
|---|
Panel 2 · Challenges Coming Your Way
FASB Trinity categories — Cisco-specific exposure assessment
Mapped from peer comment-letter history · exposure derived from your current draft disclosures
| Challenge Category | Peer Precedent | Cisco Exposure | Recommended Action |
|---|
Key Finding
53% of 2025 SEC challenges in this peer set were "significant expense categories missing." Juniper and Arista both received and resolved this challenge. Cisco's current draft disclosure shows the same pattern — see Recommended Action above.
Comment Letter Volume — FASB Trinity 2025 surge driven by ASU 2023-07 / 2023-09 first-cycle adoption
Panel 3 · Who Filed and What Happened
Upcoming peer filings — next 120 days
Filing dates inferred from each issuer's fiscal calendar · SEC comment status from EDGAR UPLOAD index · GL Intelligence processes new filings within 72 hours
Panel 4 · Commitments You Made — Status
Cisco — comment letter exchange tracker
UPLOAD → CORRESP linkage from EDGAR · response SLA monitored against 30-day window
DATA SOURCING · Every figure on this page traces to a specific SEC filing.
Peer financials are pulled directly from each issuer's XBRL submissions (no normalization, no estimation).
Comment-letter history is sourced from EDGAR
UPLOAD and CORRESP filings, classified into 15 challenge categories.
Pipeline: fasb_intelligence.sec_comment_corpus · sec_xbrl_facts · sec_company_master ·
refreshed every Sunday 06:00 UTC · EDGAR monitor adds new letters weekdays 07:00.
Segments · ASU 2023-07
Reportable operating segments · ASU 2023-07 · FY2026
Reportable segments
3
≥10% threshold
Total segment expenses
$32.1M
6 operating segments
Largest segment
50.5%
Enterprise Cloud
GL accounts classified
51
100% segment_mapping
Disclosure output
Treemap
CODM view
Threshold engine
By DISE category
Segment mapping
Live SAP master connected
ASU 2023-07 segment disclosure · FY2026 · Note X
Audit-ready| Segment | Amount ($) | % of total | Reportable | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Cloud | $16,180,175 | 50.5% | Yes | ≥10% threshold |
| Software Licenses | $7,765,000 | 24.2% | Yes | ≥10% threshold |
| Professional Services | $3,655,000 | 11.4% | Yes | ≥10% threshold |
| All other segments | $4,460,000 | 13.9% | No | ASC 280-10-50-15 |
| Total reportable segments | $32,060,175 | 100.0% | — | — |
All other: Hardware Sales ($2,395,000 · 7.5%) + Support & Maintenance ($2,065,000 · 6.4%) — below 10% threshold · aggregated per ASC 280-10-50-15
Significant expense categories by segment
ASC 280-10-50-21| Segment | Employee comp | Depreciation | Inventory | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Cloud | $1,768,400 | $1,629,375 | $3,184,000 | $9,598,400 | $16,180,175 |
| Software Licenses | $3,850,000 | $520,000 | $1,200,000 | $2,195,000 | $7,765,000 |
| Professional Services | $1,820,000 | $240,000 | $550,000 | $1,045,000 | $3,655,000 |
| Total reportable | $7,438,400 | $2,389,375 | $4,934,000 | $12,838,400 | $27,600,175 |
Segment treemap · proportional to expense base
Chief operating decision maker · ASC 280-10-50-22
Live
Run the segments pipeline to draft the CODM disclosure paragraph. The agent reads the live segment data, identifies the chief operating decision maker's allocation pattern, and writes the qualitative footnote per ASC 280.
Profit metrics by segment
ASC 280-10-50-22| Segment | Revenue | Operating profit | Margin | Capital allocated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Cloud | $48,200,000 | $16,180,000 | 33.6% | $98,000,000 |
| Software Licenses | $22,500,000 | $7,765,000 | 34.5% | $45,000,000 |
| Professional Services | $13,200,000 | $3,655,000 | 27.7% | $28,000,000 |
| All other | $8,800,000 | $2,420,000 | 27.5% | $18,000,000 |
| Total | $92,700,000 | $30,020,000 | 32.4% | $189,000,000 |
CODM allocation insight
The CODM uses operating profit margin as the primary measure to assess segment performance and allocate resources.
Capital is allocated proportionally to revenue contribution, with Enterprise Cloud receiving the largest share (~52%) reflecting its growth trajectory.
Margins compress in Professional Services due to talent-intensive delivery; this is monitored quarterly.
10% threshold engine · live
Run the threshold engine — every operating segment is tested against the threshold; below-threshold segments are aggregated as "All other" per ASC 280-10-50-15. Foots back to consolidated total.
Segment-to-consolidated reconciliation
—| Component | Amount |
|---|---|
| Run the threshold engine to populate. | |
DISE category breakdown across all segments · FY2022
| DISE category | Amount | Classifier | Accounts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other expenses | $5,714,400 | SAP data | 135 |
| Employee compensation | $1,768,400 | SAP data | 81 |
| Depreciation | $1,629,375 | Mapping agent | 21 |
| Purchases of inventory | $3,184,000 | Mapping agent | 26 |
| Intangible asset amortization | -$386,000 | SAP data | 6 |
| not_applicable (excluded) | $15,321,100 | Mapping agent | 42 |
Segment mapping · operating segments + corporate
Profit-center coverage| Segment ID | Segment name | Type | Reportable | Geography |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEG01 | Enterprise Cloud | operating | Yes | NA · EU · APAC |
| SEG02 | Cloud Infrastructure | operating | Yes | NA · EU · APAC |
| SEG03 | Software Licenses | operating | Yes | NA · EU |
| SEG04 | Professional Services | operating | Yes | NA |
| SEG05 | Hardware Sales | operating | Yes | NA · EU · APAC |
| SEG06 | Support & Maintenance | operating | Yes | NA · EU · APAC |
| CORP | Corporate and unallocated | corporate | No | Headquarters · Shared |
Live data from SAP S/4HANA Cloud
BestRun tenant connected
Pulled directly from SAP via the API Business Hub — the segment master, profit-center hierarchy, and cost-center registry your disclosure rolls up from. ASU 2023-07 segment reporting reads from these.
Segments
—
A_Segment master
Profit centers
—
A_ProfitCenter master
Cost centers
—
A_CostCenter master
Company codes
—
A_CompanyCode master
SAP segments
—| ID | Name |
|---|---|
| Loading from SAP… | |
Profit centers
—| ID | Name | Segment |
|---|---|---|
| Loading from SAP… | ||
Cost centers
—| ID | Name | Profit center | Company code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading from SAP… | |||
Anomaly alerts
Loading…
Segments · ASU 2023-07
0
—
Tax recon · ASU 2023-09
0
—
DISE · ASU 2024-03
0
—
All anomaly alerts
Loading alerts…
Finance Agents
Specialized AI agents for finance close, disclosure, and analytics
Active agents
11
Compliance · disclosure · analytics
Total runs
—
Across all agents
Output tables
19
Versioned, audit-ready
Agent registry
11 agents · standard contract| Agent | Module | Latest run | Cadence | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||
Latest agent run output
Click Run on any agent above
—
Output, summary tables, and write paths will appear here.
Ask the GL · natural-language agent
Conversational Q&A on your live financial data
Grounded in your data
Total tax expense & ETR
ETR reconciliation
Tax GL accounts
DISE variance
Close tracker
Segments
Foreign rate
CFO risks
General Ledger
Loading…
Journal entries
—
Posted FY2026
Total debit
—
Foots to credit ✓
GL accounts
—
In use this year
Cost centers
—
Across reporting
All—
DISE—
ASU 2024-03
Tax recon—
ASU 2023-09
Segments—
ASU 2023-07
Journal entries
Accounts
Audit log
Immutable trail of controller and CFO actions
Loading audit events…
Upload & classify
Drop your chart of accounts. The mapping agent will classify every row live with citations and confidence scores.
Step 1 · Provide your data
CSV · JSON · ExcelDrop CSV here or browse
Columns expected:
Up to 5,000 accounts per upload
gl_account, description, posting_amountUp to 5,000 accounts per upload
Step 2 · Run the mapping agent
IdleUpload a CSV first, then we'll classify every account against the FASB DISE schema with full IRC/ASC citations.
Upload chart of accounts
Mapping agent running
Persist to review queue
Awaiting upload0%
Live classifications
No data| Account | Description | DISE caption | Category | Citation | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drop a CSV to begin. | |||||
Review queue
Human-in-the-loop items requiring controller or CFO sign-off across all three FASB mandates.
Pending review
—
Awaiting controller
Low-confidence
—
Conf < 70%
Narratives
—
DISE + tax · approve
Anomalies open
—
By severity
Classifications
Narratives
Anomalies
Sign-off status
Account classifications awaiting review
—
| GL account | Description | Caption | Natural category | Confidence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||
Footnote narratives awaiting approval
—Loading…
Open anomalies by severity
| Alert | Mandate | Severity | GL account | Amount | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||
Close-cycle sign-off status
✓
Controller · T005
Tables foot · narratives in place · audit trail complete
★
CFO approval · T006
Final sign-off · disclosure hash locks the package
Connections
ERPs, sub-ledgers, and integrations powering this tenant.
Internal controls
SOX-aligned control matrix, segregation-of-duties rules, and COSO framework mapping.
Active controls
—
— key controls
High risk
—
Audit committee scope
SoD rules
—
Conflict pairs monitored
COSO mappings
—
Five components covered
Control matrix
Segregation of duties
COSO mapping
Active controls
—| ID | Control | Type | Owner | Frequency | SOX assertion | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||||||
SoD rules & conflict pairs
—| Conflict type | Role A | Role B | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||||
COSO control mapping
| Control | Component | Principle | Maturity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||