BE Technology / Dashboard
Demo mode 501-account dataset · synthetic close + audit + runs · live API not connected

GL Intelligence

GL Intelligence · FASB Trinity disclosure pipeline Live data
Segment reporting
3
Reportable operating segments
ASU 2023-07 · effective FY2024
Tax reconciliation
vs 21% statutory
ASU 2023-09 · effective FY2025
Disaggregated expenses
$0
Loading
ASU 2024-03 · effective FY2027
Composition by caption
ETR Waterfall · statutory → effective
Table A
Loading waterfall…
Tax bridge summary
21% → —
Statutory rate
21.00%
Effective rate
Net reconciling items
Total tax expense
Per ASC 740-10-50 · disclosed reconciling components ≥5% of statutory tax shown as bars.
Module status
Recent activity
Loading recent activity…

Close tracker

Loading…
Tasks
IDTaskOwnerStatus
Loading…
Timeline
Loading…

DISE · ASU 2024-03

Loading…
Footnote draft not run
Idle
Click Generate footnote — the agent will run the full pipeline: classify → materiality threshold → narrative drafting per material caption → publishable Note.
COGS
Variance $0 ✓
SG&A
Variance $0 ✓
R&D
Variance $0 ✓
Variance
$0
All captions ✓
Composition by caption
$0 variance
Disaggregated income statement expenses
Click row to drill down
Expense captionDISE totalIS amountVariance
Loading…

Tax reconciliation · ASU 2023-09

Loading…
Table A — ETR reconciliation
Waterfall
Table C — pretax income
Qualitative narratives
Effective tax rate reconciliation
Footed ✓
Line itemAmount ($)Rate (%)Material
Loading…
Loading…
ETR waterfall · how statutory becomes effective
Each bar shows how a single ETR component adds to or reduces the rate. Click a bar to see the underlying line items and IRC citations.
Income before taxes — domestic vs foreign
Footed ✓
ComponentAmount ($)
Loading…
Loading…
Domestic / Foreign split
Foreign Tax Rate Differential
$744,167 · 44.8%95%
The Company's foreign operations are subject to tax rates that differ from the US federal statutory rate. The unfavorable differential primarily reflects Subpart F inclusions under IRC Section 951 on passive income from foreign subsidiaries and withholding taxes on intercompany distributions, which more than offset the benefit of lower statutory rates in Ireland and Singapore where the Company maintains manufacturing operations and intellectual property holding structures.
State and Local Income Taxes
$4,714,700 · 13.74%95%
The effective tax rate reflects state and local income tax obligations across multiple jurisdictions where the Company maintains significant business operations. The Company files combined unitary returns in California and New York, which impose corporate income tax rates of 8.84% and 7.25%, respectively. State tax liabilities are apportioned using a three-factor formula weighted toward sales.
Nontaxable Income and Nondeductible Expenses
$2,259,600 · 6.59%95%
The Company recognized net nondeductible expenses that increased the effective tax rate primarily due to stock-based compensation for which the deduction under IRC Section 83 has not yet been realized, meals and entertainment expenses subject to the 50% limitation under IRC Section 274, and executive compensation exceeding the $1 million deductibility cap under IRC Section 162(m).
Cross-Border Tax Laws (GILTI)
$1,100,000 · 3.21%95%
The Company recognized current tax expense under the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income provisions of IRC Section 951A. The inclusion represents excess net tested income from controlled foreign corporations over the ten percent return on qualified business asset investment threshold.

Controller sign-off · T005

ASU 2023-09 tax disclosure review · Loading…
Prerequisites T001–T004 all complete · 4 narratives drafted at 95% confidence · audit trail in BigQuery
Table A
Table C
Audit trail
Table A · ETR reconciliation
Footed ✓
Line itemAmountRate %Material
Loading…
Table C · Domestic vs foreign
Footed ✓
ComponentAmount
Loading…
Audit trail
Immutable
Source tablediplomatic75.dise_reporting.tax_disclosure_output
Run ID2022-012-001
Narrative run IDnarrative-2022-002
Source dataCORTEX_SAP_CDC.BSEG · diplomatic75
Data sourceLoading…
Table A foots correctly — loading…
Table C cross-checks — loading…
Material items (>5%) have qualitative narrative — foreign rate differential confirmed
IRC citations verified — §951 Subpart F, §951A GILTI, §83, §274, §162(m) referenced correctly
Agrees to trial balance — total tax expense agrees to GL account balances
Audit trail complete — source data, run IDs, model version, and timestamps logged
Controller name

CFO approval · T006

Final sign-off before 10-K filing · ASU 2023-09 · Loading…
T001–T005 all complete · Controller sign-off recorded · 4 narratives at 95% confidence
Total tax expense
Loading
Effective tax rate
vs statutory
Foreign pretax income
Foreign exposure
Close tasks
T006 pending
Executive summary · income tax position
ASU 2023-09
Total tax expense
Loading…
Effective tax rate
Loading…
Largest ETR driver
Subpart F + withholding taxes exceed Ireland/Singapore benefit
Domestic vs foreign
Loading…
GILTI position
IRC §951A included
IRC §250 deduction not claimed — pending analysis
Data source
Loading…
No spreadsheets · full audit trail in BigQuery
Key risk items for CFO awareness
IRC §250 GILTI deduction not yet claimed — ETR would decrease if claimed. Disclose as uncertain position if material.
Monitor
ETR significantly above statutory — expect analyst and auditor questions on foreign differential.
Disclosure risk
All GL accounts mapped · $0 DISE variance · Controller sign-off complete · audit trail immutable.
Resolved
I have reviewed total income tax expense and confirm it is consistent with my understanding of the Company's tax position
I have reviewed the ETR and the foreign rate differential disclosure and confirm the narrative accurately explains the drivers
I am aware the IRC §250 GILTI deduction has not been claimed and confirm this is an acceptable disclosure position
I confirm the ASU 2023-09 disclosure is complete, accurate, and ready for inclusion in the 10-K filing
CFO name
Title

EDGAR Intelligence

Comment-letter exchange + peer XBRL — sourced from SEC EDGAR (sec_comment_corpus · sec_xbrl_facts · sec_company_master)
Live · 156 letters indexed YTD
Comment letters · 5yr
4
Cisco vs peer median 3.5 · 1 currently open
Open commitments
1
CODM definition · SEC still watching 19 days
2025 sector surge
156
SIC 3576 letters · +50% vs 2024
XBRL facts indexed
2.08M
4,677 filers · CY2023–CY2025 · refreshed Sun 06:00
Panel 1 · Your Peer-Relative Risk

SIC 3576 — Computer Communications Equipment

Trailing four quarters · GAAP basis · ETR is effective rate from rate reconciliation
Company Revenue ($B) Gross Margin % SGA % R&D % ETR %
SEC Enforcement Posture vs Peers Trailing 5 years · sourced from EDGAR UPLOAD/CORRESP linkage
Company Comment Letters Avg Rounds to Close Currently Open
Panel 2 · Challenges Coming Your Way

FASB Trinity categories — Cisco-specific exposure assessment

Mapped from peer comment-letter history · exposure derived from your current draft disclosures
Challenge Category Peer Precedent Cisco Exposure Recommended Action
!
Key Finding 53% of 2025 SEC challenges in this peer set were "significant expense categories missing." Juniper and Arista both received and resolved this challenge. Cisco's current draft disclosure shows the same pattern — see Recommended Action above.
Comment Letter Volume — FASB Trinity 2025 surge driven by ASU 2023-07 / 2023-09 first-cycle adoption
Panel 3 · Who Filed and What Happened

Upcoming peer filings — next 120 days

Filing dates inferred from each issuer's fiscal calendar · SEC comment status from EDGAR UPLOAD index · GL Intelligence processes new filings within 72 hours
Panel 4 · Commitments You Made — Status

Cisco — comment letter exchange tracker

UPLOAD → CORRESP linkage from EDGAR · response SLA monitored against 30-day window
DATA SOURCING · Every figure on this page traces to a specific SEC filing. Peer financials are pulled directly from each issuer's XBRL submissions (no normalization, no estimation). Comment-letter history is sourced from EDGAR UPLOAD and CORRESP filings, classified into 15 challenge categories. Pipeline: fasb_intelligence.sec_comment_corpus · sec_xbrl_facts · sec_company_master · refreshed every Sunday 06:00 UTC · EDGAR monitor adds new letters weekdays 07:00.

Segments · ASU 2023-07

Reportable operating segments · ASU 2023-07 · FY2026
Reportable segments
3
≥10% threshold
Total segment expenses
$32.1M
6 operating segments
Largest segment
50.5%
Enterprise Cloud
GL accounts classified
51
100% segment_mapping
Disclosure output
Treemap
CODM view
Threshold engine
By DISE category
Segment mapping
Live SAP master connected
ASU 2023-07 segment disclosure · FY2026 · Note X
Audit-ready
SegmentAmount ($)% of totalReportableBasis
Enterprise Cloud$16,180,17550.5%Yes≥10% threshold
Software Licenses$7,765,00024.2%Yes≥10% threshold
Professional Services$3,655,00011.4%Yes≥10% threshold
All other segments$4,460,00013.9%NoASC 280-10-50-15
Total reportable segments$32,060,175100.0%
All other: Hardware Sales ($2,395,000 · 7.5%) + Support & Maintenance ($2,065,000 · 6.4%) — below 10% threshold · aggregated per ASC 280-10-50-15
Significant expense categories by segment
ASC 280-10-50-21
SegmentEmployee compDepreciationInventoryOtherTotal
Enterprise Cloud$1,768,400$1,629,375$3,184,000$9,598,400$16,180,175
Software Licenses$3,850,000$520,000$1,200,000$2,195,000$7,765,000
Professional Services$1,820,000$240,000$550,000$1,045,000$3,655,000
Total reportable$7,438,400$2,389,375$4,934,000$12,838,400$27,600,175
Segment treemap · proportional to expense base
Chief operating decision maker · ASC 280-10-50-22
Live
Run the segments pipeline to draft the CODM disclosure paragraph. The agent reads the live segment data, identifies the chief operating decision maker's allocation pattern, and writes the qualitative footnote per ASC 280.
Profit metrics by segment
ASC 280-10-50-22
SegmentRevenueOperating profitMarginCapital allocated
Enterprise Cloud$48,200,000$16,180,00033.6%$98,000,000
Software Licenses$22,500,000$7,765,00034.5%$45,000,000
Professional Services$13,200,000$3,655,00027.7%$28,000,000
All other$8,800,000$2,420,00027.5%$18,000,000
Total$92,700,000$30,020,00032.4%$189,000,000
CODM allocation insight

The CODM uses operating profit margin as the primary measure to assess segment performance and allocate resources.

Capital is allocated proportionally to revenue contribution, with Enterprise Cloud receiving the largest share (~52%) reflecting its growth trajectory.

Margins compress in Professional Services due to talent-intensive delivery; this is monitored quarterly.

10% threshold engine · live
Run the threshold engine — every operating segment is tested against the threshold; below-threshold segments are aggregated as "All other" per ASC 280-10-50-15. Foots back to consolidated total.
Segment-to-consolidated reconciliation
ComponentAmount
Run the threshold engine to populate.
DISE category breakdown across all segments · FY2022
DISE categoryAmountClassifierAccounts
Other expenses$5,714,400SAP data135
Employee compensation$1,768,400SAP data81
Depreciation$1,629,375Mapping agent21
Purchases of inventory$3,184,000Mapping agent26
Intangible asset amortization-$386,000SAP data6
not_applicable (excluded)$15,321,100Mapping agent42
Segment mapping · operating segments + corporate
Profit-center coverage
Segment IDSegment nameTypeReportableGeography
SEG01Enterprise CloudoperatingYesNA · EU · APAC
SEG02Cloud InfrastructureoperatingYesNA · EU · APAC
SEG03Software LicensesoperatingYesNA · EU
SEG04Professional ServicesoperatingYesNA
SEG05Hardware SalesoperatingYesNA · EU · APAC
SEG06Support & MaintenanceoperatingYesNA · EU · APAC
CORPCorporate and unallocatedcorporateNoHeadquarters · Shared
Live data from SAP S/4HANA Cloud
BestRun tenant connected
Pulled directly from SAP via the API Business Hub — the segment master, profit-center hierarchy, and cost-center registry your disclosure rolls up from. ASU 2023-07 segment reporting reads from these.
Segments
A_Segment master
Profit centers
A_ProfitCenter master
Cost centers
A_CostCenter master
Company codes
A_CompanyCode master
SAP segments
IDName
Loading from SAP…
Profit centers
IDNameSegment
Loading from SAP…
Cost centers
IDNameProfit centerCompany code
Loading from SAP…

Anomaly alerts

Loading…
All 0 High 0 Medium 0 Low 0
Segments · ASU 2023-07
0
Tax recon · ASU 2023-09
0
DISE · ASU 2024-03
0
Loading alerts…

Finance Agents

Specialized AI agents for finance close, disclosure, and analytics
Active agents
11
Compliance · disclosure · analytics
Total runs
Across all agents
Output tables
19
Versioned, audit-ready
Agent registry
11 agents · standard contract
AgentModuleLatest runCadenceActions
Loading…
Click Run on any agent above
Output, summary tables, and write paths will appear here.
Conversational Q&A on your live financial data
Grounded in your data
Total tax expense & ETR
ETR reconciliation
Tax GL accounts
DISE variance
Close tracker
Segments
Foreign rate
CFO risks

General Ledger

Loading…
Journal entries
Posted FY2026
Total debit
Foots to credit ✓
GL accounts
In use this year
Cost centers
Across reporting
All
DISE ASU 2024-03
Tax recon ASU 2023-09
Segments ASU 2023-07
Journal entries
Accounts
Doc # Date Type Account Description DISE caption Natural cat. Segment Cost center Debit Credit
Loading entries…
All captions 0
GL accountDescriptionDISE captionCategoryAmountConf.
Loading…

Audit log

Immutable trail of controller and CFO actions
All Tax DISE Platform
Loading audit events…

Upload & classify

Drop your chart of accounts. The mapping agent will classify every row live with citations and confidence scores.
Step 1 · Provide your data
CSV · JSON · Excel
Drop CSV here or browse
Columns expected: gl_account, description, posting_amount
Up to 5,000 accounts per upload
Step 2 · Run the mapping agent
Idle
Upload a CSV first, then we'll classify every account against the FASB DISE schema with full IRC/ASC citations.
Upload chart of accounts
Mapping agent running
Persist to review queue
Awaiting upload0%
Live classifications
No data
AccountDescriptionDISE captionCategoryCitationConfidence
Drop a CSV to begin.

Review queue

Human-in-the-loop items requiring controller or CFO sign-off across all three FASB mandates.
Pending review
Awaiting controller
Low-confidence
Conf < 70%
Narratives
DISE + tax · approve
Anomalies open
By severity
Classifications
Narratives
Anomalies
Sign-off status
Account classifications awaiting review
GL accountDescriptionCaptionNatural categoryConfidenceAction
Loading…
Footnote narratives awaiting approval
Loading…
Open anomalies by severity
AlertMandateSeverityGL accountAmountAction
Loading…
Close-cycle sign-off status
Controller · T005
Tables foot · narratives in place · audit trail complete
Ready to sign
CFO approval · T006
Final sign-off · disclosure hash locks the package
Awaiting CFO

Connections

ERPs, sub-ledgers, and integrations powering this tenant.

Internal controls

SOX-aligned control matrix, segregation-of-duties rules, and COSO framework mapping.
Active controls
— key controls
High risk
Audit committee scope
SoD rules
Conflict pairs monitored
COSO mappings
Five components covered
Control matrix
Segregation of duties
COSO mapping
Active controls
IDControlTypeOwnerFrequencySOX assertionRisk
Loading…
SoD rules & conflict pairs
Conflict typeRole ARole BDescriptionSeverity
Loading…
COSO control mapping
ControlComponentPrincipleMaturity
Loading…